On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 01:16:09AM +0000, Greg Stark wrote: > > On 1 Dec 2015 19:48, "Tom Lane" <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > > In passing, avoid possible calculation of log10(0). Probably that's > > harmless, given the lack of field complaints, but it seems risky: > > conversion of NaN to an integer isn't well defined. > > Am I going to have to fire up the emulator again?
Greg's lightning talk in Vienna about how he got the emulator working was priceless. I know he posted the VAX results, but how he got them was amazing. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
