On 2016-01-04 10:35:12 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > If we don't know of a specific problem that would be fixed by > back-patching this commit to pre-9.5 branches, and it seems like we > don't, then I don't really see much upside to back-patching it. I > mean, yeah, we think that this is wrong because we think we know that > the behavior of Windows is different than what we thought when the > code was written. But if we were wrong then, we could be wrong now, > too. If so, it would be better to only have broken 9.5.
I think it always was just a typo, given code a few lines down in the same function, added by the same commit, treated that case differently. Anyway, I don't have a particularly strong opinion here, so ... -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
