On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes: >> Attached fixes a typo: s/non-exstant/non-existant. >> Alternatively, it could be spelled as 'existent' but the patch doesn't. > > "non-existant" is flat wrong, so if we're going to fix typos, let's > fix them to actually be English.
So, non-existent? non-extant? I seems to me like an 's' accidentally sneaked in when the author of the comment tried to write the latter spelling. But the former sounds more familiar (at least to me). Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
