Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Obviously this wasn't the best idea ever.  Andrew suggests on IM to
>> revert this on Cygwin to just do the "isatty" check as originally.

> Here's a proposed patch.  Thoughts?

Ugly, but it will hold the fort until someone can debug the service
code for Cygwin.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to