Simon Riggs wrote: > I think we could do better still, but this looks like the easiest 80% and > actually removes code. > > The lack of substantial comments on the patch is a problem though - the > details above should go in the patch. I'll have a go at reworking this for > you, this time.
Is someone submitting an updated patch here? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers