Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > I think this would be a useful addition. A couple of problems: > This change in the comment doesn't make sense to me and doesn't seem to > match the code:
> - /* If we have COPY [BINARY] <sth>, complete it with "TO" or "FROM" */ > + /* If we have COPY|BINARY <sth>, complete it with "TO" or "FROM" */ Offhand, that looks like an accidental reversion of a change made in 9b181b0363deb65b15a9feaf3eb74f86707498a9. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers