Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 12/13/15 9:16 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > > Please see the attached to address those things (and others) with > > extra fixes for a couple of comments. > > I have ported these changes to the new world order and divided them up > into more logical changes that are more clearly documented. Please > check that this matches what you had in mind.
One thing I just noticed is that CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY cannot be used within CREATE SCHEMA, so perhaps the lines that match the CONCURRENTLY keyword should use Matches() rather than TailMatches(). Similarly (but perhaps this is not workable) the lines that TailMatch() but do not Match() should not offer CONCURRENTLY after INDEX. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers