On 01/18/2016 01:47 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 02:24:46PM -0800, Joe Conway wrote: >> On 01/16/2016 06:02 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> wrote: >>>> 1) Change NextXID output format from "%u/%u" to "%u:%u" >>>> (see recent hackers thread) >>> >>> ! printf(_("Latest checkpoint's NextXID: %u/%u\n"), >>> ControlFile.checkPointCopy.nextXidEpoch, >>> ControlFile.checkPointCopy.nextXid); >>> printf(_("Latest checkpoint's NextOID: %u\n"), >>> --- 646,652 ---- >>> ControlFile.checkPointCopy.ThisTimeLineID); >>> printf(_("Latest checkpoint's full_page_writes: %s\n"), >>> ControlFile.checkPointCopy.fullPageWrites ? _("on") : >>> _("off")); >>> ! printf(_("Latest checkpoint's NextXID: %u:%u\n"), >>> This should be definitely a separate patch. >> >> Ok. Notwithstanding Simon's reply, there seems to be consensus that this >> is the way to go. Will commit it this way unless some additional >> objections surface in the next day or so. > > FYI, this slash-colon change will break pg_upgrade unless it is patched. > Dp you want a patch from me?
Didn't realize that -- yes please. Thanks, Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
Description: OpenPGP digital signature