Paul Ramsey <[email protected]> writes: > Thank the Maker, it is reproduceable: returning an expanded header in the _in > function is not appreciated in a very narrow number of cases.
Thanks for finding a test case! I'll check into it shortly.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
