On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 3:52 PM, David Rowley
<david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 21 January 2016 at 15:53, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.harib...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Haribabu Kommi
>> <kommi.harib...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Here I attached updated patch of parallel aggregate based on the latest
>> > changes in master. Still it lack of cost comparison of normal aggregate
>> > to
>> > parallel aggregate because of difficulty. This cost comparison is
>> > required
>> > in parallel aggregate as this is having some regression when the number
>> > of groups are less in the query plan.
>> >
>> Updated patch is attached after removing a warning in building group
>> aggregate path.
> Hi,
> Thanks for updating the patch. I'd like to look at this with priority, but
> can you post it on the Parallel Agg thread? that way anyone following there
> can chime in over there rather than here.  I've still got a bit of work to
> do (in the not too distant future) on the serial/deserial part, so would be
> better to keep this thread for discussion on that.

Thanks for the details. Sorry for sending parallel aggregate patch in
this thread.
I will take care of it from next time onward.

Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to