On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 08:25:27AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:50 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think there's absolutely no point in spending more time on this for > > 9.5. At least 4 committers have looked at it and none of them are > > convinced by the current design; feedback from almost half a year ago > > hasn't been incorporated; obviously-needed parts of the patch > > (pg_restorebackup) are missing weeks after the last CF deadline. > > Let's mark this Rejected in the CF app and move on. > > Agreed. I lost a bit interest in this patch lately, but if all the > necessary parts of the patch were not posted before the CF deadline > that's not something we should consider for integration at this point. > Let's give it a couple of months of fresh air and, Gabriele, I am sure > you will be able to come back with something far more advanced for the > first CF of 9.6.
What's the latest on this patch? Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
