On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Vitaly Burovoy pointed on bug in my patch - a pg_size_bytes was VOLATILE
> function. It is copy/paste bug - I used pg_size_pretty definition, so the
> question is: why pg_size_pretty is volatile? It should be immutable too.

+1. This function relies only on the input of its argument to generate a result.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to