On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> By looking at the results with scale factor 1000 and 100 i don't see any > reason why it will regress with scale factor 300. > > So I will run the test again with scale factor 300 and this time i am > planning to run 2 cases. > 1. when data fits in shared buffer > 2. when data doesn't fit in shared buffer. > I have run the test again with 300 S.F and found no regression, in fact there is improvement with the patch like we saw with 1000 scale factor. Shared Buffer= 8GB max_connections=150 Scale Factor=300 ./pgbench -j$ -c$ -T300 -M prepared -S postgres Client Base Patch 1 19744 19382 8 125923 126395 32 313931 333351 64 387339 496830 128 306412 350610 Shared Buffer= 512MB max_connections=150 Scale Factor=300 ./pgbench -j$ -c$ -T300 -M prepared -S postgres Client Base Patch 1 17169 16454 8 108547 105559 32 241619 262818 64 206868 233606 128 137084 217013 -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
