On 1 February 2016 at 09:45, Alexander Korotkov
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On 29 January 2016 at 21:11, Alexander Korotkov
>> <a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>>> Should we think more about naming? Does two kinds of generic records
>>> confuse people?
>> Logical messages
>> Generic WAL records
>> Seems like I can tell them apart. Worth checking, but I think we're OK.
> I was worrying because topic name is "Generic WAL logical messages". But if
> we name them just "Logical messages" then it's OK for me.
Yeah the patch talks about logical messages, I use different title in
mailing list and CF to make it more clear on first sight what this
actually is technically.
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: