Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 01/31/2016 04:34 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:

> >This page would need a refresh IMO. I think it has not been touched
> >for the last couple of years.
> No doubt but if we can't bother to keep that refreshed what makes us think
> that a structured format in commit messages that magically (through a lot of
> hard work and extra parsing anyway) is going to be any more accurate?

If you're proposing to keep that page updated, please propose that in
pgsql-www instead of hijacking this thread.

Álvaro Herrera      
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to