Thomas Munro wrote: > Thinking of other patches in flight, I think I'd want the proposed > N-sync standbys feature to be able to explain in more detail what it's > waiting for (and likewise my causal reads proposal which does that via > the process title), though I realise that the details of how/where to > do that are changing in the "replace pg_stat_activity.waiting" thread > which this patch is waiting on.
Right, interesting thought. I think that for the time being we should close this one as returned with feedback, since there's no point in keeping it open in commitfest. I encourage the author (and everyone else) to look at the other patch and help there, which is going to ultimately achieve the outcome desired with this patch. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers