Vik Fearing <> writes:
> On 02/04/2016 01:44 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm looking into fixing the problem reported here:
>> namely that if we split a view into a table + rule (because of circular
>> dependencies), parallel pg_restore fails to ensure that it creates any
>> triggers for the view only after creating the rule.  If it tries to
>> create the triggers first, the backend may barf because they're the wrong
>> type of triggers for a plain table.

> No objections to this, but my "better idea" is simply to allow INSTEAD
> OF triggers on tables like discussed last year.

That sounds like a new feature, and not something we'd want to backpatch.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to