On 2016-02-06 17:43:48 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> >Still the data is here... But well. I won't insist.
> Huh? This thread started by an example how to cause loss of committed
> transactions. That fits my definition of "data loss" quite well.

Agreed, that view doesn't seem to make much sense. This clearly is a
data loss issue.


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to