On 08/02/16 13:41, Pavel Stehule wrote:
2016-02-08 13:22 GMT+01:00 Marko Tiikkaja <ma...@joh.to>:
Personally I find that undesirable.  I don't know what oracle does, but
variables being visible without schema-qualifying them can introduce
variable conflicts in PL/PgSQL.  I'd prefer if you could only refer to them
by prefixing them with the schema name (or maybe allow search_path to be
used).

I hope so there are not new conflicts - schema variable is not directly
visible from SQL (in this iteration) - they are visible only from functions
- and the behave is same like global plpgsql variable. So schema variable
can be in conflict with SQL identifier only exactly identically as plpgsql
variable

Yeah, and that's exactly what I don't want, because that means that CREATE SCHEMA VARIABLE suddenly breaks existing code.

But prefix can be used.

Sure, but I don't see the point. Is there a reason not to require such variable references to be prefixed with the schema name? Or explicitly bring them into scope in the DECLARE section somehow.


.m


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to