On 10 February 2016 at 22:39, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> So I propose the attached patch.  Any objections?  Should this get
> >> back-patched?  It's arguably a bug, though surely a minor one, that
> >> the message comes out when it does.
> > I would vote against a back-patch.  And I kind of agree with Jim's
> > comments that we ought to consider sprinkling a few more debug
> > messages into the shutdown sequence.
> [ shrug... ]  I won't stand in the way of someone else figuring out
> what makes sense there, but I don't intend to do it; and I don't think
> that the quick hacks I did over the last couple days make a reasonable
> basis for a permanent patch.

I think its worth adding log messages, but only when its slower than

Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Reply via email to