On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 2:46 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I did not bump the extension version. I realized the migration file >> would be empty, as there no change to SQL-level functionality (the new >> s2k-count is parsed out of a string down in the C code). Since only >> one version of contrib extensions binary object files are installed in >> any given postgres installation, people using the newer binary gets >> the feature even if they have not updated the extension version. So I >> don't know if it makes sense to bump the version if people inherently >> get the feature anyway. > > There's zero reason to bump the extension version if the SQL interface > hasn't changed. > > (I have no opinion on the underlying patch.)
+1. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
