On February 12, 2016 5:40:29 PM GMT+01:00, Yury Zhuravlev <u.zhurav...@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >Andres Freund wrote: >> Unless I am missing something major, that doesn't seem to >> achieve all that much. A cast to a char based bool wouldn't >> normalize this to 0 or 1. So you're still not guaranteed to be >> able to do somebool == anotherbool when either are set based on >> such a macro. >> > >In C99 cast to bool return 0 or 1 only.
Don't you say. That's why I brought all this up. > In older compilers nothing >changes >(Now the code is designed to "char == char"). >I think this is a good option. But of course to write bool and use char > >strange. Did you read what I wrote? That's not correct for char booleans, because the can have different bits set. Andres --- Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers