Julien Rouhaud wrote:
Hijacking this macro is just too obscure:
> #define auto_explain_enabled() \
> (auto_explain_log_min_duration >= 0 && \
> - (nesting_level == 0 || auto_explain_log_nested_statements))
> + (nesting_level == 0 || auto_explain_log_nested_statements) && \
> + current_query_sampled)
because it then becomes hard to figure out that assigning to _sampled is
what makes the enabled() check pass or not depending on sampling:
> @@ -191,6 +211,14 @@ _PG_fini(void)
> static void
> explain_ExecutorStart(QueryDesc *queryDesc, int eflags)
> {
> + /*
> + * For ratio sampling, randomly choose top-level statement. Either
> + * all nested statements will be explained or none will.
> + */
> + if (auto_explain_log_min_duration >= 0 && nesting_level == 0)
> + current_query_sampled = (random() < auto_explain_sample_ratio *
> + MAX_RANDOM_VALUE);
> +
> if (auto_explain_enabled())
> {
I think it's better to keep the "enabled" macro unmodified, and just add
another conditional to the "if" test there.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
