Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I think this is a bug and we ought to fix the code to include the
>> metapage in the reported index_size. Thoughts?
> I tend to agree, but I think you should note that specifically in the
> documentation. I'm in favor of tools like pgstattuple and pageinspect
> going into this kind of detail in their documentation generally.
Yeah ... the numbers already appear not to add up because the root page
is counted in index_size but not any other column, so there's already
something worthy of explanation there. Maybe something like "The reported
index_size will normally correspond to two more pages than are accounted
for by internal_pages + leaf_pages + empty_pages + deleted_pages, because
it also includes the index's metapage and root page".
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
