On 2/18/16 3:30 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > I don't understand why you're so opposed to this. Several people said > that they're interested in this information in the current discussion > and it has been requested repeatedly over the years.
I think no one except Andrew Dunstan has requested this, and his use case is disputed. Everyone else is either confusing this with the pg_controldata part or is just transitively claiming that someone else wanted it. I don't have a problem with the implementation, but I don't understand what this feature is meant for. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
