On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> But those pages are supposed to be used as the index grows.  So unless
> they are forgotten by the FSM, they shouldn't accumulate.  (Except where
> the table doesn't grow but only shrinks, so there's no need for new
> index pages, but I don't think that's an interesting case.)

Sure. I'm talking about a narrow issue around how things are
represented in pgstatindex() only.

Peter Geoghegan

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to