On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > But those pages are supposed to be used as the index grows. So unless > they are forgotten by the FSM, they shouldn't accumulate. (Except where > the table doesn't grow but only shrinks, so there's no need for new > index pages, but I don't think that's an interesting case.)
Sure. I'm talking about a narrow issue around how things are represented in pgstatindex() only. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
