Joe, all, * Joe Conway (m...@joeconway.com) wrote: > On 02/21/2016 08:38 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Coverity griped about use of unchecked strcpy() into a local variable. > > There's unlikely to be any actual bug there, since no caller would be > > passing a path longer than MAXPGPATH, but nonetheless use of strlcpy() > > seems preferable. > > FWIW, strcpy() was being used in src/bin/pg_config/pg_config.c that I > started with -- does that mean we are not getting Coverity coverage of > src/bin?
Coverity does run against src/bin also. It's possible this was identified as an issue in pg_config.c, but, as Tom notes, it may not be an actual bug and might have been marked as a non-bug in Coverity. Thanks! Stephen
Description: Digital signature