Tom Lane wrote: > Given our inability to come to a consensus on rejiggering the uses of > "missing", I think maybe we should just apply the original patch and > call it good.
For the record: Tom applied this patch as commit dccf8e9e608824ce15. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
