Craig Ringer wrote: > Hi all > > I've been working with the new TAP tests for recovery and have a number of > enhancements I'd like to make to the tooling to make writing tests easier > and nicer.
I think we should change the existing psql method to be what you propose as psql_expert. I don't see any advantage in keeping the old one. Many of the existing uses of psql should become what you call psql_check; but we should probably call that psql_ok() instead, and also have a psql_fails() for src/test/recovery/t/001_stream_rep.pl (and others to come). > +=item $node->backup_fs_hot(backup_name) > + > +Create a backup with a filesystem level copy in $node->backup_dir, > +including transaction logs. Archiving must be enabled as pg_start_backup > +and pg_stop_backup are used. This is not checked or enforced. Perhaps "WAL archiving or streaming must be enabled ..." I would rather have the patches be submitted with a reasonable approximation at indentation rather than submit a separate indent patch. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
