On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote:
> Needs Review -> Needs Review
> Waiting on Author -> Refuse moving
> Ready for committer -> Ready for Committer
> Committed -> refuse moving
> Moved to next cf -> refuse moving (if it's already set like this, it would
> probably be a bug)
> Returned with feedback -> Refuse moving
> Which basically means we only move things that are in needs review or ready
> for committer state, and that we never actually change the status of a patch
> in the moving.
> Is that a correct summary?
Yes, thanks for the summary. It looks like this is what people would
expect based on what I read here.
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: