Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > This approach seems good to me, and the performance results look very > positive. The nice thing about this is that there is not a > user-configurable knob; the system automatically determines when > larger extensions are needed, which will mean that real-world users > are much more likely to benefit from this. I don't think it matters > that this is a little faster or slower than an approach with a manual > knob; what matter is that it is a huge improvement over unpatched > master, and that it does not need a knob. The arbitrary constant of > 10 is a little unsettling but I think we can live with it.
+1. "No knob" is a huge win. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers