On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 6:52 AM, Julien Rouhaud
<julien.rouh...@dalibo.com> wrote:
> Very good suggestion.
> I think the most productive way to work on this is to start a wiki page
> to summarize what's the available information, what we should store and
> how to represent it.
> I'll update this thread as soon as I'll have a first draft finished.

New design discussions are a little bit late for 9.6 I am afraid :(
Perhaps we should consider this patch as returned with feedback for
the time being? The hook approach is not something I'd wish for if we
can improve in-core facility that would help user to decide better how
to tune autovacuum parameters. The VACUUM progress facility covers a
different need by helping to track how long a scan is still going to
take. What we want here is something that would run on top of that.
Logs at least may be helpful for things like pgbadger.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to