Andres Freund wrote:
> I do wonder if adding a PGCTLPOSTGRESWRAPPER or something to pg_ctl
> would be ok. That'd just supplant calling the postgres binary, making
> all this easier.
This seems a reasonably principled way to go about this. Eventually we
might plug other things in it ...
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: