On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 18:21 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 08:45 -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Tomas Vondra
> > <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > thanks for the feedback. Attached is v14 of the patch series, fixing
> > > most of the points you've raised.
> > Hi Tomas,
> > Applied to aa09cd242fa7e3a694a31f, I still get the seg faults in make
> > check if I configure without --enable-cassert.
> Ah, after disabling asserts I can reproduce it too. And the reason why
> it fails is quite simple - clauselist_selectivity modifies the original
> list of clauses, which then confuses cost_qual_eval.
More precisely, it gets confused because the first clause in the list
gets deleted but cost_qual_eval never learns about that, and follows
stale pointer to the next cell, thus a segfault.
> Can you try if the attached patch fixes the issue? I'll need to rework a
> bit more of the code, but let's see if this fixes the issue on your
> machine too.
> > With --enable-cassert, it passes the regression test.
> I wonder how can it work with casserts and fail without them. That's
> kinda exactly the opposite to what I'd expect ...
FWIW it seems to be somehow related to this assert in clausesel.c:
relid, MV_CLAUSE_TYPE_MCV | MV_CLAUSE_TYPE_HIST) >= 2);
With the assert in place, the code passes without a failure. After
removing the assert (commenting it out), or even just changing it to
MV_CLAUSE_TYPE_MCV | MV_CLAUSE_TYPE_HIST)
+ count_mv_attnums(stat_conditions, relid,
MV_CLAUSE_TYPE_MCV | MV_CLAUSE_TYPE_HIST) >= 2);
i.e. removing the list_union, it fails as expected.
The only thing that I can think of is that list_union happens to place
the right stuff at the right position in memory - pure luck.
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: