On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Gilles Darold <gilles.dar...@dalibo.com> writes:
> > Then, should I have to use an alternate file to store the information or
> > implement a bidirectional communication with the syslogger?
> I'd just define a new single-purpose file $PGDATA/log_file_name
> or some such.

Would it make sense to have it as a symlink instead?


Reply via email to