On 2016-03-12 01:05:43 +0300, Vladimir Borodin wrote: > > 12 марта 2016 г., в 0:22, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> написал(а): > > Only that it isn't. It's stored in PGPROC. > > Sorry, I missed that. So monitoring of wait events for auxiliary processes > still could be implemented?
It's basically a question of where to report the information. > >> Seems that current implementation doesn’t give reasonable ways to > >> implement all that features and it is really sad. > > > > Why is that? > > Storing information about wait event in 4 bytes gives an ability to > store only wait type and event. No way to store duration or extra > information (i.e. buffer number for I/O events or buffer manager > LWLocks). Maybe I’m missing something... Sure, but that that's just incrementally building features? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers