[Aside: your new mail editor is rewrapping lines in quoted material, and the
result is messy. I have rerewrapped one paragraph below.]
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 02:00:03AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-03-13 at 18:46 -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> > I've not attempted to study the behavior on slow hardware. Instead, my
> > report used stat-coalesce-v1.patch[1] to simulate slow writes. (That
> > diagnostic patch no longer applies cleanly, so I'm attaching a rebased
> > version. I've changed the patch name from "stat-coalesce" to
> > "slow-stat-simulate" to more-clearly distinguish it from the
> > "pgstat-coalesce" patch.) Problems remain after applying your patch;
> > consider "VACUUM pg_am" behavior:
> >
> > 9.2 w/ stat-coalesce-v1.patch:
> > VACUUM returns in 3s, stats collector writes each file 1x over 3s
> > HEAD w/ slow-stat-simulate-v2.patch:
> > VACUUM returns in 3s, stats collector writes each file 5x over 15s
> > HEAD w/ slow-stat-simulate-v2.patch and your patch:
> > VACUUM returns in 10s, stats collector writes no files over 10s
>
> Oh damn, the timestamp comparison in pgstat_recv_inquiry should be in
> the opposite direction. After fixing that "VACUUM pg_am" completes in 3
> seconds and writes each file just once.
That fixes things. "make check" passes under an 8s stats write time.
> --- a/src/backend/postmaster/pgstat.c
> +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/pgstat.c
> @@ -4836,6 +4836,20 @@ pgstat_recv_inquiry(PgStat_MsgInquiry *msg, int len)
> }
>
> /*
> + * Ignore requests that are already resolved by the last write.
> + *
> + * We discard the queue of requests at the end of
> pgstat_write_statsfiles(),
> + * so the requests already waiting on the UDP socket at that moment
> can't
> + * be discarded in the previous loop.
> + *
> + * XXX Maybe this should also care about the clock skew, just like the
> + * block a few lines down.
Yes, it should. (The problem is large (>~100s), backward clock resets, not
skew.) A clock reset causing "msg->clock_time < dbentry->stats_timestamp"
will usually also cause "msg->cutoff_time < dbentry->stats_timestamp". Such
cases need the correction a few lines down.
The other thing needed here is to look through and update comments about
last_statrequests. For example, this loop is dead code due to us writing
files as soon as we receive one inquiry:
/*
* Find the last write request for this DB. If it's older than the
* request's cutoff time, update it; otherwise there's nothing to do.
*
* Note that if a request is found, we return early and skip the below
* check for clock skew. This is okay, since the only way for a DB
* request to be present in the list is that we have been here since the
* last write round.
*/
slist_foreach(iter, &last_statrequests) ...
I'm okay keeping the dead code for future flexibility, but the comment should
reflect that.
Thanks,
nm
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
