On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:31 AM, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > Ah, I see the nuance. Thanks for the explanation. Maybe, > bt_index_check() and bt_index_parent_child_check() / > bt_index_check_parent_child(). IMHO, the latter more clearly highlights > the fact that parent/child relationships in the form of down-links are > checked.
Well, the downlink is in the parent, because there is no such thing as an "uplink". So I prefer bt_index_parent_check(), since it usefully hints at starting from the parent. It's also more concise. > By the way, one request (as a non-native speaker of English language, who > ends up looking up quite a few words regularly) - > > Could we use "conform" or "correspond" instead of "comport" in the > following error message: > > "left link/right link pair in index \"%s\" don't comport" OK. I'll do something about that. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
