On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 5:15 AM, David Steele <[email protected]> wrote: > It looks like this patch should be marked "needs review" and I have done so.
Uh, no it shouldn't. I've posted an extensive review on the original design thread. See CF entry: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/9/433/ Marked "Waiting on Author". -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
