On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > It would be helpful if you could either (a) confirm that that patch > still applies and that it has no issues of this type or (b) post an > updated version.
I don't think that it has a problem with lacking the right int64 format specifiers. However, I had a bad feeling about integer overflow of state->currentRun, and think I'll need to address that. After all, if runs are now no longer 2x work_mem on average, it's not completely ridiculous to imagine that being an issue on a misconfigured system. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
