On 2016-03-16 13:29:22 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Whoa. At 64 clients, we're hardly getting any benefit, but then by 88
> clients, we're getting a huge benefit. I wonder why there's that sharp
> change there.
What's the specifics of the machine tested? I wonder if it either
correlates with the number of hardware threads, real cores, or cache
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: