Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes: > I can live with SELECT fx(x). It is little bit dangerous, but this risk can > be easy detected by plpgsql_check.
Dangerous how? >> So, I'm -1 on not having any keyword at all. I have no objection >> to Merlin's proposal though. I agree that PERFORM is starting to >> look a bit silly, since it doesn't play with WITH for instance. > Isn't time to fix PERFORM instead? I do not think it can be fixed without embedding knowledge of PERFORM into the core parser, which I doubt anybody would consider a good idea. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers