On 3/22/16 8:54 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Michael Paquier > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 1:38 AM, David Steele <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 3/15/16 10:01 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: >>> >>>> Ok, I understand that this is not an issue in a hurry. I'll go to >>>> another patch that needs review. >>> >>> Since we're getting towards the end of the CF is it time to pick this up >>> again? >> >> Perhaps not. This is a legit bug with an unfinished patch (see index >> relation truncation) that is going to need a careful review. I don't >> think that this should be impacted by the 4/8 feature freeze, so we >> could still work on that after the embargo and we've had this bug for >> months actually. FWIW, I am still planning to work on it once the CF >> is done, in order to keep my manpower focused on actual patch reviews >> as much as possible... > > In short, we may want to bump that to next CF... I have already marked > this ticket as something to work on soonish on my side, so it does not > change much seen from here if it's part of the next CF. What we should > just be sure is not to lose track of its existence.
I would prefer not to bump it to the next CF unless we decide this will not get fixed for 9.6. -- -David [email protected] -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
