> No, I think we left it that way on purpose. I don't remember the > discussion exactly, but I don't think it's hurting anything.
This was a part of original dynahash optimization patch. Since that patch was about performance improvement and this concrete change is about refactoring, not performance, we agreed to discuss it later as a separate patch. > I don't think this actually buys us anything. For sure it doesn't make anything worse. Current code is just confusing. I spent quite some time trying to figure out what is a reason for passing two arguments before I realized - there is none. -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev http://eax.me/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
