* Michael Paquier (michael.paqu...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote: > >> v40 is yet another rebase. > > > > Thanks. Committed after removing an unnecessary parameter from the > > coerceToXXX() functions. > > > > I guess the question here is whether we want the part-c patch, which > > removes the historical \setrandom syntax. That's technically no > > longer needed since we now can use random() as a function directly > > inside \set commands, but we might want it anyway for backward > > compatibility. > > > > Anybody have an opinion on that? > > +1 for nuking it. That's not worth the trouble maintaining it.
If we don't nuke it, it'll never die. See also: pg_shadow Thanks! Stephen
Description: Digital signature