On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Shulgin, Oleksandr <
oleksandr.shul...@zalando.de> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr.shul...@zalando.de> writes:
>> > What I dislike about this POC is all the disruption in libpq, to be
>> > honest.
>> Yeah, I don't much like that either.  But I don't think we can avoid
>> some refactoring there; as designed, conversion of an error message into
>> user-visible form is too tightly tied to receipt of the message.
> True.  Attached is a v2 which addresses all of the points raised earlier I
> believe.
> We still extract the message building part of code from
> pqGetErrorNotice3(), but the user-facing change is much more sane now: just
> added a new function PQresultVerboseErrorMessage().

I wonder if this sort of change has any chance to be back-patched?  If not,
it would be really nice to have any sort of review soonish.

Thank you.

Reply via email to