Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> What we need is a unique index on pg_constraint. >> The problem with that is that pg_constraint contains both table-related >> and type (domain) related constraints; but it strikes me that we could >> probably create a unique index on (conrelid, contypid, conname).
> Weren't you proposing elsewhere to split pg_constraint in two catalogs, > one for table constraint and another for domain constraints? That seems > a cleaner solution to me. Yeah, and you'll notice how much progress we've made towards that. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers