On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Andres Freund wrote: >> On 2016-03-31 10:15:21 +0900, Ian Barwick wrote: > >> > Patch changes the error message to: >> > >> > ERROR: replication slots can only be used if wal_level is "replica" or >> > "logical" >> > >> > Explicitly naming the valid WAL levels matches the wording in the wal_level >> > error hint used in a couple of places, i.e. >> >> The explicit naming makes it much more verbose to change anything around >> wal level though, so consider me not a fan of spelling out all levels. > > I thought we had agreed that we weren't going to consider the wal_level > values as a linear scale -- in other words, wordings such as "greater > than FOO" are discouraged. That's always seemed a bit odd to me.
Yes, that's what I thought as well. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
