On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net>

> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 4:00 AM, David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> wrote:
> So maybe we should at least start that way. And just document that
> clearly, and then use the patch that we have right now?
> Except we add so it still returns the stoppoint() as well (which is
> returned from the current pg_stop_backup, but not in the new one).
> We can always extend the function with more columns later if we need -
> it's changing the ones we have that's a big problem there :)
+1 for doing that way for now.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Reply via email to