At 2016-04-04 18:55:03 -0300, alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: > > At this point I think we're missing user-level docs for the additional > clause in each ALTER command.
Thanks for having a look. Now that you're happy with the grammar, I'll write the remaining docs and resubmit the patch later today. > Do you have any ideas on how this would appear in regression tests? No specific ideas. At a high level, I think we should install an empty extension, create one of each kind of object, alter them to depend on the extension, check that pg_depend has the right 'x' rows, then drop the extension and make sure the objects have gone away. Does that sound reasonable? Suggestions welcome. -- Abhijit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers